Obama to Offer
Deficit-Cutting Plan as Fiscal Fight Broadens
Published: April 10, 2011 - New York Times
WASHINGTON — President
Obama will call this week for Republicans to join him in writing a broad
plan to raise revenues and reduce the growth of popular entitlement programs, as
the battle over the nationfs financial troubles moves past Fridayfs short-term
budget deal and into a wider and more consequential debate over the nationfs
long-term fiscal health.
In a speech to be delivered at a university here on Wednesday, Mr. Obama will
in effect come off the sidelines on the debate over reducing the nationfs debt,
which is reaching dangerous heights as the population ages.
After months of criticism that he has not led on budget talks, Mr. Obama will
urge bipartisan negotiations toward a multiyear debt-reduction plan that
adminstration officials said would depart sharply from the one proposed last
week by Republicans.
The House Republican plan includes a shrinking of Medicare
and Medicaid
and trillions of dollars in tax cuts, while sparing defense spending. Mr. Obama,
by contrast, envisions a more comprehensive plan that would include tax
increases for the richest taxpayers, cuts to military spending, savings in
Medicare and Medicaid, and unspecified changes to Social
Security.
In his remarks, which come after Fridayfs bipartisan deal cutting domestic
spending by about $38 billion for the remainder of this budget year, Mr. Obama
will not offer details but will set deficit-cutting goals, White House officials
said. The numbers, too, are still under discussion.
gHefll lay out his approach this week in terms of the scale of debt reduction
he thinks the country needs so we can grow economically and win the future — a
balanced approach,h David
Plouffe, the senior White House political strategist, said on gFox News
Sunday,h one of four talk shows on which he appeared Sunday.
gObviously, we need to look at all corners of government,h Mr. Plouffe said,
adding, gWefre going to have a big debate.h
Until now, Mr. Obama has avoided prescribing specific changes to entitlement
programs like Medicare, beyond those contained in his health care overhaul.
Indeed, few of the recommendations made by his own bipartisan fiscal commission
were included in the budget he presented to Congress in February.
What is more, while Mr. Obama proposed a five-year freeze on the growth of
domestic spending, he recommended increases in education, research,
infrastructure and clean-energy programs — emphasizing that although deficit
reduction is important, so are investments to create jobs and skilled workers.
The growing debate over federal spending and taxes is certain to ripple from
the White House and Congress to the 2012 presidential campaign, helping to shape
votersf assessment of Mr. Obamafs record and challenging his rivals for the
Republican presidential nomination to respond, even as they court conservative
voters who oppose any compromise with Mr. Obama.
Whether anything tangible comes of the debate, it will contrast the partiesf
visions of the role of government like no other.
Republicans reacted skeptically to word of Mr. Obamafs speech. gI sit here
and I listen to David Plouffe talk about, you know, their commitment to cut
spending and knowing full well that for the last two months, wefve had to bring
this president kicking and screaming to the table to cut spending,h
Representative Eric
Cantor of Virginia, the House majority leader, said on Fox.
The timing of Mr. Obamafs remarks reflects a White House strategy devised
late last year after Republicans won their House majority, together with the
confluence of four events, two last week and two ahead.
The 11th-hour agreement on spending cuts on Friday night, which averted a
government shutdown, removed what had been a distraction for months over this
yearfs unfinished federal
budget. Administration officials said they also hoped the compromise,
focused on six months of government spending, helped build trust with the House
speaker, John
A. Boehner, that will carry over to the larger debates about long-term
spending and the national debt.
Although some lawmakers said on Sunday that they opposed the compromise,
leaders in both parties remain confident it will pass in the House and Senate
later this week.
Also last week was the moment the administration has been awaiting for
months: Representative Paul
D. Ryan of Wisconsin, the House Budget Committee chairman, outlined House
Republicansf long-term budget plan.
It would cut $6 trillion in the coming decade — turning Medicare into a
voucher program for future generations and slashing spending for the need-based
Medicaid program and other domestic budget lines — while largely sparing the
Pentagon and cutting $4 trillion more in corporate and high-income taxes.
The White House settled on a strategy in December by which Mr. Obama would
wait for the House Republicans to lay down their cards before he proposed major
reductions in popular entitlement benefit programs, according to interviews with
administration officials at the time.
Mr. Obamafs budget waiting game, however, has helped to fuel widespread
criticism by Republicans, pundits and some Democrats that he has failed to lead.
Another impetus to his move on Wednesday is the White Housefs belief that a
self-appointed, bipartisan gGang of Sixh senators will announce this week that
they have reached agreement on a debt-reduction package similar to that of the
presidentfs fiscal commission.
After months of private discussions, the tentative agreement among the three
Republican and three Democratic senators would cut military and domestic
programs and overhaul the tax code, eliminating popular tax breaks but using the
new revenues to lower income-tax rates and reduce annual deficits. It would be
the model, if not in all details, for Mr. Obamafs own goals, Democratic
officials say.
Perhaps the biggest prod for Mr. Obama to act, however, is the need for
Congress to vote to raise the legal limit on the federal debt, now $14.25
trillion. That moment may come in as few as five weeks. Without an increase, no
later than July, the government cannot continue to finance payments on its
existing debt, potentially forcing it into an economy-shaking default.
Speaking on Saturday in Connecticut, Mr. Boehner said Republicans would not
agree to raise the cap gwithout something really, really big attached to it.h
Unlike the recent spending-cut negotiations, in which Mr. Obama was not
active until the final days, ghe knows he has to take a greater role from the
beginningh on the debt-limit measure and any companion plan for reducing debt,
said an adviser who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Several of the presidentfs political and economic advisers interviewed in
recent weeks said Mr. Obama has been torn between wanting to propose major
budget changes to entice Republicans to the bargaining table, including on
Social Security, and believing they would never agree to raise revenues on
upper-income Americans as part of a deal.
Three House Republican leaders, including Mr. Ryan, were on the fiscal
commission; unlike the three Senate Republicans, they opposed the
recommendations because they raised revenues and did not cut enough from health
care.
The risk to Mr. Obama includes further alienating liberals in his own party.
Progressive groups have formed coalitions to oppose any changes to Social
Security, for instance.